Resource center
Case Histories


INITIAL REPORT

INITIAL REPORT

STOPPING CORROSION

On the underside of a truss bridge in Meigs County, Ohio

By High Pressure (5,000 psi) Water Wash Cleaning (with C*R)

and Overcoating With the Termarust

High Ratio Co-Polymerized Calcium Sulfonate Coating System

 

 

For Meigs County

Near Rutland, Ohio

 

Cleaning & Coating by

Corrosion Protection, Inc.; New Philadelphia, Ohio

 

Coating Materials from

Termarust Technologies, Vienna, Virginia

 

Project Painting Date:  August, 2008

 

INITIAL REPORT

 

By:  Craig A. Ballinger, P.E., Termarust Technologies

Vienna, Virginia, 22180

Phone: 888-279-5497 [then press ‘4’]        Email: cballinger@termarust.com

 

OVERVIEW

This report provides some information and photos on the cleaning and Termarust coating that was done on this bridge, in August 2008, for Meigs County, Ohio.

 

The primary objective of this project was to stop structure critical corrosion on the structural steel members on the underside of the bridge – that support the deck.  The corrosion on the upper portions of the trusses was not considered critical, and because of limitations in available funding, they were not cleaned and coated with the Termarust materials.

 

The Termarust coating system was selected because of the 15+ years of field-proven history of the Termarust system to chemically stop active corrosion (including in connections and bearings) – with only minimal cleaning (mainly) with a 5,000 psi pressure washer.

 

The cost for this project would have been considerably higher (perhaps double) if sandblasting and application of a traditional 3-coat, zinc-based, coating system would have been required; which does not have the chemistry to stop active corrosion; including in connections and bearings.

 

The project involved:

Stopping structure-critical corrosion on the underside of the bridge

·        Cleaning and Termarust coating of the structural steel members that support the deck – including the lower chord members of the truss.  Only the lower 3 ft of the vertical truss members were cleaned and coated.

·        Retrofit strengthening of the ends of four of the longitudinal members under the deck; where corrosion had caused large holes in the webs.  These areas were strengthened with steel plates that were bolted to both sides of the webs. (See Photos 4, 15 and 16)

 

It is important to note: 

Containment of corrosion debris and paint chips was not required, because the existing paint did not contain lead.

 

Shown below are references and procedures for cleaning and painting, and pictures of cleaning and painting of the bridge.

 

REFERENCES

      Meigs County, Ohio

      Contact Person: Eugene Triplet – County Engineer – Phone: 740-992-2911

 

 

      Painting Contractor

Corrosion Protection, Inc. New Philadelphia, OH – Phone: 330-343-9043

Contact People: Aaron Long or Mark Preusser

 

CLEANING AND APPLICATION PROCEDURES

The following Termarust standard procedures were specified and followed:

1.      Pressure wash clean the bridge members with a 5,000 psi pressure washer (at a 6” standoff distance) with clean water, from the stream. (Photo 5)

 

2.      Heavy scale rust was removed using wet abrasive blasting, with sand in the water. (Photo 9)

 

3.      After cleaning a final rinse was done with the 5,000 psi pressure washer – with an additive of Chlor*Rid in the water to remove non-visible salts; e.g. chlorides, that contributed to the corrosion, including under the scale rust.

(For more information on Chlor*Rid – see www.chlor-rid.com)

 

4.      With dry compressed air – blow dry all connections between steel members.

 

5.      Apply Termarust TR2200 Penetrant into all ‘open’ connections; especially where there is crevice corrosion and pack rust.

 

6.      Apply a 10 mil DFT caulk (or stripe) coat of Termarust TR2100 Topcoat into open connections; where there is crevice corrosion and pack rust; on top of the TR2200 Penetrant.

 

7.      Spot prime areas of bare steel and tightly adhered (contaminant free) rust with 5 mils DFT of Termarust TR2100 Topcoat

 

8.      Overcoat the entire area with another 5 mils DFT of TR2100 Topcoat.

 

9.      Note:  after cleaning and coating the ends of the four longitudinal beams (with corrosion caused holes in the webs) steel plates were bolted to both sides of the webs.  The ‘inside’ of the steel plates were coated with Termarust before they were installed, and the outside of the plates were coated after installation.  (Photos 4, 15 and 16)

 

It is important to note that steps 5 through 8 may be done immediately after each other; i.e. wet-on-wet; which is why the Termarust system is considered to be a “One Coat” system.

 

The final result was:

·   5 mils DFT (Dry Film Thickness) on tight paint,

·   10 mils DFT on bare steel and tight rust, and

·   20 mils DFT over connections.

 

PICTORIAL OVERVIEW

The following pictures provide a pictorial overview of the project.

Photo 1 – Side view of the truss.  Note – the corrosion on the upper portions of the truss were considered not critical, and for economic reasons they were not cleaned and coated.

 

Photo 2 – All members supporting the deck have serious corrosion problems.

 

Photo 3 – Close-up of one of the transverse beams and connections.

 

Photo 4 – The ends of 4 stringers had holes in the webs equal or larger than this

Photo 5 – Water for washing came from the stream, was put into the yellow ‘settling’ tanks.  Clean water was then moved into the white plastic tanks to supply the pressure washer.

 

Photo 6 – A rolling scaffold platform was used to access the underside of the bridge.

 

Photo 7 – A tarp was installed under the platform

 

Photo 8 – A 5,000 psi pressure washer was used to remove loose paint and loose rust.

 

Photo 9 – Scale rust was removed using 5,000 psi pressure wash with sand abrasive,

 

Photo 10 – Close-up of beam ready for painting – showing tight clean rust and tight paint.

 

Photo 11 – Two of the transverse beams have been painted, one is clean and ready for painting.

 

Photo 12 – Painted end of a transverse beam – showing where corrosion had thinned the web.

 

Photo 13 – Three of the transverse beams that have been cleaned and coated with Termarust.

 

Photo 14 – End of a beam and the gusset plate have been coated with the Termarust system.

Photo 15 – One of the four beams that repairs were made on.  The end of the beam had been cleaned and coated, as had the ‘inside’ surfaces of the reinforcing plates (on both sides of the beam)

 

Photo 16 – The outside surface of the reinforcing plates were coated after installation of the plates.

 

Photo 17 – Only the lower chords of the truss and the lower 3’ of the vertical members were coated.

 

Photo 18 – The project has been completed, supports for the platform will be removed.



 
Copyright 2002-2010 Termarust Technologies. All rights reserved.